↓ Skip to main content

Comprehensive analysis of the genome transcriptome and proteome landscapes of three tumor cell lines

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Medicine, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
113 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comprehensive analysis of the genome transcriptome and proteome landscapes of three tumor cell lines
Published in
Genome Medicine, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/gm387
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pelin Akan, Andrey Alexeyenko, Paul Igor Costea, Lilia Hedberg, Beata Werne Solnestam, Sverker Lundin, Jimmie Hällman, Emma Lundberg, Mathias Uhlén, Joakim Lundeberg

Abstract

We here present a comparative genome, transcriptome and functional network analysis of three human cancer cell lines (A431, U251MG and U2OS), and investigate their relation to protein expression. Gene copy numbers significantly influenced corresponding transcript levels; their effect on protein levels was less pronounced. We focused on genes with altered mRNA and/or protein levels to identify those active in tumor maintenance. We provide comprehensive information for the three genomes and demonstrate the advantage of integrative analysis for identifying tumor-related genes amidst numerous background mutations by relating genomic variation to expression/protein abundance data and use gene networks to reveal implicated pathways.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 113 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 2 2%
Korea, Republic of 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 107 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 27%
Researcher 24 21%
Student > Master 17 15%
Student > Bachelor 11 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 6%
Other 16 14%
Unknown 8 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 12 11%
Computer Science 6 5%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 11 10%
Unknown 7 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,710,762
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Genome Medicine
#796
of 1,585 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,989
of 285,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Medicine
#13
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,585 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.8. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 285,532 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.