↓ Skip to main content

A matrix rank based concordance index for evaluating and detecting conditional specific co-expressed gene modules

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
11 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A matrix rank based concordance index for evaluating and detecting conditional specific co-expressed gene modules
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2912-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhi Han, Jie Zhang, Guoyuan Sun, Gang Liu, Kun Huang

Abstract

 Gene co-expression network analysis (GCNA) is widely adopted in bioinformatics and biomedical research with applications such as gene function prediction, protein-protein interaction inference, disease markers identification, and copy number variance discovery. Currently there is a lack of rigorous analysis on the mathematical condition for which the co-expressed gene module should satisfy. In this paper, we present a linear algebraic based Centralized Concordance Index (CCI) for evaluating the concordance of co-expressed gene modules from gene co-expression network analysis. The CCI can be used to evaluate the performance for co-expression network analysis algorithms as well as for detecting condition specific co-expression modules. We applied CCI in detecting lung tumor specific gene modules. Simulation showed that CCI is a robust indicator for evaluating the concordance of a group of co-expressed genes. The application to lung cancer datasets revealed interesting potential tumor specific genetic alterations including CNVs and even hints for gene-fusion. Deeper analysis required for understanding the molecular mechanisms of all such condition specific co-expression relationships. The CCI can be used to evaluate the performance for co-expression network analysis algorithms as well as for detecting condition specific co-expression modules. It is shown to be more robust to outliers and interfering modules than density based on Pearson correlation coefficients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 9%
Brazil 1 9%
Unknown 9 82%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 27%
Researcher 3 27%
Professor 1 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 9%
Unknown 3 27%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 27%
Computer Science 2 18%
Linguistics 1 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 9%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 9%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 3 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2016.
All research outputs
#20,337,788
of 22,883,326 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#9,293
of 10,668 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#300,229
of 343,744 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#242
of 273 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,883,326 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,668 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 343,744 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 273 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.