You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Attention Score in Context
Systematic review and meta-analysis of risk terrain modelling (RTM) as a spatial forecasting method
Crime Science, June 2021
Marchment, Zoe, Gill, Paul
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 44 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
|Members of the public||22||50%|
|Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors)||5||11%|
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
|Readers by professional status||Count||As %|
|Student > Master||6||21%|
|Student > Bachelor||3||10%|
|Student > Doctoral Student||1||3%|
|Lecturer > Senior Lecturer||1||3%|
|Readers by discipline||Count||As %|
|Earth and Planetary Sciences||2||7%|
|Business, Management and Accounting||1||3%|
|Agricultural and Biological Sciences||1||3%|
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2022.
All research outputs
of 24,289,456 outputs
Outputs from Crime Science
of 202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
of 407,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Crime Science
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,289,456 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 407,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.