↓ Skip to main content

Do Malawian women critically assess the quality of care? A qualitative study on women’s perceptions of perinatal care at a district hospital in Malawi

Overview of attention for article published in Reproductive Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
88 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
300 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Malawian women critically assess the quality of care? A qualitative study on women’s perceptions of perinatal care at a district hospital in Malawi
Published in
Reproductive Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1742-4755-9-30
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lily C Kumbani, Ellen Chirwa, Address Malata, Jon Øyvind Odland, Gunnar Bjune

Abstract

Malawi has a high perinatal mortality rate of 40 deaths per 1,000 births. To promote neonatal health, the Government of Malawi has identified essential health care packages for improving maternal and neonatal health in health care facilities. However, regardless of the availability of health services, women's perceptions of the care is important as it influences whether the women will or will not use the services. In Malawi 95% of pregnant women receive antenatal care from skilled attendants, but the number is reduced to 71% deliveries being conducted by skilled attendants. The objective of this study was to describe women's perceptions on perinatal care among the women delivered at a district hospital.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 300 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Indonesia 1 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Burundi 1 <1%
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 288 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 87 29%
Researcher 46 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 11%
Student > Postgraduate 22 7%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Other 44 15%
Unknown 50 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 18%
Social Sciences 32 11%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 2%
Other 26 9%
Unknown 52 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2015.
All research outputs
#12,804,088
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Reproductive Health
#904
of 1,404 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,612
of 159,110 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Reproductive Health
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,404 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.7. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 159,110 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.