↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of serological lateral flow assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
23 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evaluation of serological lateral flow assays for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12879-021-06257-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bianca A. Trombetta, Savannah E. Kandigian, Robert R. Kitchen, Korneel Grauwet, Pia Kivisäkk Webb, Glenn A. Miller, Charles G. Jennings, Sejal Jain, Samara Miller, Yikai Kuo, Thadryan Sweeney, Tal Gilboa, Maia Norman, Daimon P. Simmons, Christopher E. Ramirez, Melissa Bedard, Catherine Fink, Jina Ko, Esmarline J. De León Peralta, Gerald Watts, Emma Gomez-Rivas, Vannessa Davis, Rocky M. Barilla, Jianing Wang, Pierre Cunin, Samuel Bates, Chevaun Morrison-Smith, Benjamin Nicholson, Edmond Wong, Leena El-Mufti, Michael Kann, Anna Bolling, Brooke Fortin, Hayden Ventresca, Wen Zhou, Santiago Pardo, Megan Kwock, Aditi Hazra, Leo Cheng, Q. Rushdy Ahmad, James A. Toombs, Rebecca Larson, Haley Pleskow, Nell Meosky Luo, Christina Samaha, Unnati M. Pandya, Pushpamali De Silva, Sally Zhou, Zakary Ganhadeiro, Sara Yohannes, Rakiesha Gay, Jacqueline Slavik, Shibani S. Mukerji, Petr Jarolim, David R. Walt, Becky C. Carlyle, Lauren L. Ritterhouse, Sara Suliman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 10 11%
Researcher 6 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 7%
Student > Master 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 43 48%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 17%
Chemistry 4 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 3%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 46 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,554,841
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#2,590
of 7,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#149,536
of 418,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#79
of 206 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,804 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 418,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 206 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.