You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Healthcare provider characteristics that influence the implementation of individual-level patient-centered outcome measure (PROM) and patient-reported experience measure (PREM) data across practice settings: a protocol for a mixed methods systematic review with a narrative synthesis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-021-01725-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Angela C. Wolff, Andrea Dresselhuis, Samar Hejazi, Duncan Dixon, Deborah Gibson, A. Fuchsia Howard, Sarah Liva, Barbara Astle, Sheryl Reimer-Kirkham, Vanessa K. Noonan, Lisa Edwards |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 14 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Librarian | 6 | 5% |
| Other | 21 | 17% |
| Unknown | 58 | 46% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 21 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 10% |
| Unspecified | 9 | 7% |
| Psychology | 5 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 11% |
| Unknown | 59 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 October 2022.
All research outputs
#13,375,104
of 23,571,271 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#1,392
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,121
of 448,839 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#51
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,571,271 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,839 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.