↓ Skip to main content

Re-thinking treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in paediatric oncology population: the perspective from a developing country

Overview of attention for article published in Infectious Agents and Cancer, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Re-thinking treatment strategies for febrile neutropenia in paediatric oncology population: the perspective from a developing country
Published in
Infectious Agents and Cancer, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13027-021-00387-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Vinson James, Anand Prakash, Kayur Mehta, Tarangini Durugappa

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 15%
Student > Master 2 15%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Lecturer 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Unknown 5 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 5 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Unknown 6 46%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 June 2021.
All research outputs
#6,382,685
of 20,503,899 outputs
Outputs from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#87
of 450 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,863
of 341,720 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infectious Agents and Cancer
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,503,899 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 450 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 341,720 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them