You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of improved rural sanitation on diarrhoea and helminth infection: design of a cluster-randomized trial in Orissa, India
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Emerging Themes in Epidemiology, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1742-7622-9-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Thomas Clasen, Sophie Boisson, Parimita Routray, Oliver Cumming, Marion Jenkins, Jeroen H J Ensink, Melissa Bell, Matthew C Freeman, Soosai Peppin, Wolf-Peter Schmidt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| India | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| India | 2 | 1% |
| Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 33 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 7% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 21 | 11% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 27 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 9% |
| Engineering | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 21% |
| Unknown | 31 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2012.
All research outputs
#14,611,150
of 22,685,926 outputs
Outputs from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#109
of 144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#107,474
of 179,099 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Emerging Themes in Epidemiology
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,685,926 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,099 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.