↓ Skip to main content

CAZyChip: dynamic assessment of exploration of glycoside hydrolases in microbial ecosystems

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Genomics, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
25 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
CAZyChip: dynamic assessment of exploration of glycoside hydrolases in microbial ecosystems
Published in
BMC Genomics, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12864-016-2988-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anne Abot, Gregory Arnal, Lucas Auer, Adèle Lazuka, Delphine Labourdette, Sophie Lamarre, Lidwine Trouilh, Elisabeth Laville, Vincent Lombard, Gabrielle Potocki-Veronese, Bernard Henrissat, Michael O’Donohue, Guillermina Hernandez-Raquet, Claire Dumon, Véronique Anton Leberre

Abstract

Microorganisms constitute a reservoir of enzymes involved in environmental carbon cycling and degradation of plant polysaccharides through their production of a vast variety of Glycoside Hydrolases (GH). The CAZyChip was developed to allow a rapid characterization at transcriptomic level of these GHs and to identify enzymes acting on hydrolysis of polysaccharides or glycans. This DNA biochip contains the signature of 55,220 bacterial GHs available in the CAZy database. Probes were designed using two softwares, and microarrays were directly synthesized using the in situ ink-jet technology. CAZyChip specificity and reproducibility was validated by hybridization of known GHs RNA extracted from recombinant E. coli strains, which were previously identified by a functional metagenomic approach. The GHs arsenal was also studied in bioprocess conditions using rumen derived microbiota. The CAZyChip appears to be a user friendly tool for profiling the expression of a large variety of GHs. It can be used to study temporal variations of functional diversity, thereby facilitating the identification of new efficient candidates for enzymatic conversions from various ecosystems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 19 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 11%
Other 5 8%
Lecturer 4 6%
Other 13 21%
Unknown 4 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 17 27%
Environmental Science 5 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 6%
Chemistry 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 6 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 October 2018.
All research outputs
#7,037,962
of 23,498,099 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#3,159
of 10,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,939
of 344,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#77
of 274 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,498,099 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,787 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 344,951 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 274 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.