↓ Skip to main content

A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
20 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
54 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
182 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A scoping review of Q-methodology in healthcare research
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01309-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kate Churruca, Kristiana Ludlow, Wendy Wu, Kate Gibbons, Hoa Mi Nguyen, Louise A. Ellis, Jeffrey Braithwaite

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 182 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 24 13%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 7%
Researcher 12 7%
Student > Bachelor 9 5%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 75 41%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 24 13%
Social Sciences 14 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 6%
Psychology 10 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 4%
Other 32 18%
Unknown 83 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2023.
All research outputs
#2,659,943
of 24,597,084 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#407
of 2,181 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,532
of 435,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#7
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,597,084 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,181 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,319 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.