↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of denosumab and zoledronic acid for the treatment of solid tumors and multiple myeloma with bone metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
16 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
37 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of denosumab and zoledronic acid for the treatment of solid tumors and multiple myeloma with bone metastasis: a systematic review and meta-analysis based on randomized controlled trials
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13018-021-02554-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianghai Jiang, Xianghua Cui, Haoning Ma, Xiangsheng Tang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 37 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 21 57%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 22%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 22 59%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2021.
All research outputs
#18,807,229
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#983
of 1,428 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#319,491
of 443,946 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#31
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,428 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,946 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.