↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of adaptive versions of the Hong Kong-specific criteria and 2015 Beers criteria for assessing potentially inappropriate medication use in Hong Kong older patients

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Geriatrics, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (56th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
17 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of adaptive versions of the Hong Kong-specific criteria and 2015 Beers criteria for assessing potentially inappropriate medication use in Hong Kong older patients
Published in
BMC Geriatrics, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12877-021-02324-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Huanyu ZHANG, Eliza L. Y. WONG, Samuel Y. S. WONG, Patsy Y. K. CHAU, Benjamin H. K. YIP, Roger Y. N. CHUNG, Eric K. P. LEE, Francisco T. T. LAI, Eng-kiong YEOH

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 17 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 17 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 2 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 12%
Lecturer 1 6%
Student > Bachelor 1 6%
Researcher 1 6%
Other 2 12%
Unknown 8 47%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 18%
Chemistry 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Unknown 9 53%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 July 2021.
All research outputs
#13,392,150
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Geriatrics
#1,981
of 3,310 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,699
of 444,798 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Geriatrics
#75
of 116 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,310 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.4. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 444,798 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 116 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.