You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
PD-1/PD-L1 checkpoint inhibitors during late stages of life: an ad-hoc analysis from a large multicenter cohort
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Translational Medicine, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12967-021-02937-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniele Santini, Tea Zeppola, Marco Russano, Fabrizio Citarella, Cecilia Anesi, Sebastiano Buti, Marco Tucci, Alessandro Russo, Maria Chiara Sergi, Vincenzo Adamo, Luigia S. Stucci, Melissa Bersanelli, Giulia Mazzaschi, Francesco Spagnolo, Francesca Rastelli, Francesca Chiara Giorgi, Raffaele Giusti, Marco Filetti, Paolo Marchetti, Andrea Botticelli, Alain Gelibter, Marco Siringo, Marco Ferrari, Riccardo Marconcini, Maria Giuseppa Vitale, Linda Nicolardi, Rita Chiari, Michele Ghidini, Olga Nigro, Francesco Grossi, Michele De Tursi, Pietro Di Marino, Laura Pala, Paola Queirolo, Sergio Bracarda, Serena Macrini, Stefania Gori, Alessandro Inno, Federica Zoratto, Enrica T. Tanda, Domenico Mallardo, Maria Grazia Vitale, Thomas Talbot, Paolo A. Ascierto, David J. Pinato, Corrado Ficorella, Giampiero Porzio, Alessio Cortellini |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 22% |
| Colombia | 1 | 11% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 56% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 26 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 3 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 8% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 4% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 4 | 15% |
| Unknown | 13 | 50% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 19% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 8% |
| Unknown | 14 | 54% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,431,370
of 24,076,257 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Translational Medicine
#999
of 4,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,466
of 430,001 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Translational Medicine
#17
of 98 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,076,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 430,001 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 98 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.