You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Can intersectionality help with understanding and tackling health inequalities? Perspectives of professional stakeholders
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Health Research Policy and Systems, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12961-021-00742-w |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel Holman, Sarah Salway, Andrew Bell, Brian Beach, Adewale Adebajo, Nuzhat Ali, Jabeer Butt |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 7 | 41% |
| United States | 2 | 12% |
| Oman | 1 | 6% |
| Ireland | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 6 | 35% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 47% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 29% |
| Scientists | 4 | 24% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 153 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 16 | 10% |
| Researcher | 15 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 14% |
| Unknown | 72 | 47% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 20 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 12% |
| Social Sciences | 12 | 8% |
| Psychology | 8 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Unknown | 79 | 52% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,827,451
of 23,316,003 outputs
Outputs from Health Research Policy and Systems
#237
of 1,232 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,338
of 443,210 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Health Research Policy and Systems
#5
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,316,003 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,232 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,210 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.