↓ Skip to main content

“We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach

Overview of attention for article published in Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#14 of 511)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
138 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
24 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
63 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“We are not hard to reach, but we may find it hard to trust” …. Involving and engaging ‘seldom listened to’ community voices in clinical translational health research: a social innovation approach
Published in
Research Involvement and Engagement, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s40900-021-00292-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Safina Islam, Olivia Joseph, Atiha Chaudry, Davine Forde, Annie Keane, Cassie Wilson, Nasima Begum, Suzanne Parsons, Tracy Grey, Leah Holmes, Bella Starling

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 138 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 63 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 63 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 11%
Student > Master 6 10%
Student > Bachelor 5 8%
Lecturer 3 5%
Other 6 10%
Unknown 25 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 13 21%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 5%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 8 13%
Unknown 28 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 98. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2024.
All research outputs
#431,840
of 25,369,304 outputs
Outputs from Research Involvement and Engagement
#14
of 511 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,787
of 427,112 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research Involvement and Engagement
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,369,304 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 511 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 427,112 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.