↓ Skip to main content

Strengthening methods for tracking adaptations and modifications to implementation strategies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (59th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
27 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Strengthening methods for tracking adaptations and modifications to implementation strategies
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01326-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Amber D. Haley, Byron J. Powell, Callie Walsh-Bailey, Molly Krancari, Inga Gruß, Christopher M. Shea, Arwen Bunce, Miguel Marino, Leah Frerichs, Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Rachel Gold

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 48 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 15%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 6%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 6 13%
Unknown 18 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 10%
Psychology 4 8%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Unspecified 2 4%
Other 8 17%
Unknown 21 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 September 2021.
All research outputs
#4,953,634
of 24,208,207 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#769
of 2,152 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110,400
of 431,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#18
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,208,207 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,152 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 431,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.