↓ Skip to main content

A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
18 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
46 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
214 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A systematic review of interventions to enhance access to best practice primary health care for chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-12-415
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth Jean Comino, Gawaine Powell Davies, Yordanka Krastev, Marion Haas, Bettina Christl, John Furler, Anthony Raymont, Mark F Harris

Abstract

Although primary health care (PHC) is a key component of all health care systems, services are not always readily available, accessible or affordable. This systematic review examines effective strategies to enhance access to best practice processes of PHC in three domains: chronic disease management, prevention and episodic care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 3 1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Malawi 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Bolivia, Plurinational State of 1 <1%
Other 2 <1%
Unknown 199 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 44 21%
Student > Master 32 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Other 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 11 5%
Other 49 23%
Unknown 34 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 81 38%
Social Sciences 25 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 11 5%
Psychology 10 5%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 40 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 December 2012.
All research outputs
#2,726,879
of 23,339,727 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#1,157
of 7,812 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,877
of 279,234 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#14
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,339,727 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,812 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 279,234 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.