↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of six statistical methods for interrupted time series studies: empirical evaluation of 190 published series

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
26 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
150 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of six statistical methods for interrupted time series studies: empirical evaluation of 190 published series
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01306-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Simon L. Turner, Amalia Karahalios, Andrew B. Forbes, Monica Taljaard, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Joanne E. McKenzie

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 26 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 150 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 150 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 15%
Student > Master 20 13%
Other 6 4%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 4%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 50 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 29 19%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Social Sciences 9 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 4%
Computer Science 4 3%
Other 29 19%
Unknown 62 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2024.
All research outputs
#2,519,676
of 25,391,701 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#366
of 2,275 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,892
of 454,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#8
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,391,701 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,275 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 454,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.