↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of six statistical methods for interrupted time series studies: empirical evaluation of 190 published series

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
19 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
24 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of six statistical methods for interrupted time series studies: empirical evaluation of 190 published series
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01306-w
Authors

Simon L. Turner, Amalia Karahalios, Andrew B. Forbes, Monica Taljaard, Jeremy M. Grimshaw, Joanne E. McKenzie

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 24 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 24 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 25%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 21%
Student > Master 4 17%
Student > Bachelor 2 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 17%
Social Sciences 3 13%
Computer Science 2 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Mathematics 1 4%
Other 5 21%
Unknown 8 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#2,518,863
of 19,019,810 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#426
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,083
of 335,986 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,019,810 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,986 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them