You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Did the English strategy reduce inequalities in health? A difference-in-difference analysis comparing England with three other European countries
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Public Health, August 2016
|
DOI | 10.1186/s12889-016-3505-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yannan Hu, Frank J. van Lenthe, Ken Judge, Eero Lahelma, Giuseppe Costa, Rianne de Gelder, Johan P. Mackenbach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 5 | 23% |
Netherlands | 4 | 18% |
Ireland | 2 | 9% |
Australia | 1 | 5% |
Unknown | 10 | 45% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 11 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 27% |
Scientists | 5 | 23% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Finland | 1 | 1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Denmark | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 79 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 9 | 11% |
Researcher | 8 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 10% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
Other | 17 | 21% |
Unknown | 21 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 23% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 13 | 16% |
Social Sciences | 11 | 13% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 4 | 5% |
Other | 5 | 6% |
Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 34. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 December 2020.
All research outputs
#1,210,236
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,370
of 17,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,838
of 353,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#37
of 418 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,819 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 418 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.