↓ Skip to main content

Comparison of different mechanical chest compression devices in the alpine rescue setting: a randomized triple crossover experiment

Overview of attention for article published in Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
58 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Comparison of different mechanical chest compression devices in the alpine rescue setting: a randomized triple crossover experiment
Published in
Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13049-021-00899-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Egger Alexander, Tscherny Katharina, Fuhrmann Verena, Grafeneder Jürgen, Niederer Maximilian, Kienbacher Calvin, Schachner Andreas, Schreiber Wolfgang, Herkner Harald, Roth Dominik

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 58 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 58 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Master 4 7%
Unspecified 3 5%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 2 3%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 36 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Unspecified 3 5%
Engineering 2 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 36 62%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 July 2021.
All research outputs
#6,648,638
of 25,109,453 outputs
Outputs from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#569
of 1,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,329
of 434,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
#20
of 49 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,109,453 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,988 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 49 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.