↓ Skip to main content

Immortalized pathological human myoblasts: towards a universal tool for the study of neuromuscular disorders

Overview of attention for article published in Skeletal Muscle, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
patent
3 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
226 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
317 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Immortalized pathological human myoblasts: towards a universal tool for the study of neuromuscular disorders
Published in
Skeletal Muscle, November 2011
DOI 10.1186/2044-5040-1-34
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kamel Mamchaoui, Capucine Trollet, Anne Bigot, Elisa Negroni, Soraya Chaouch, Annie Wolff, Prashanth K Kandalla, Solenne Marie, James Di Santo, Jean Lacau St Guily, Francesco Muntoni, Jihee Kim, Susanne Philippi, Simone Spuler, Nicolas Levy, Sergiu C Blumen, Thomas Voit, Woodring E Wright, Ahmed Aamiri, Gillian Butler-Browne, Vincent Mouly

Abstract

Investigations into both the pathophysiology and therapeutic targets in muscle dystrophies have been hampered by the limited proliferative capacity of human myoblasts. Isolation of reliable and stable immortalized cell lines from patient biopsies is a powerful tool for investigating pathological mechanisms, including those associated with muscle aging, and for developing innovative gene-based, cell-based or pharmacological biotherapies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 317 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 3 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Unknown 308 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 74 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 21%
Student > Master 38 12%
Student > Bachelor 20 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 13 4%
Other 45 14%
Unknown 62 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 93 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 73 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 23 7%
Engineering 12 4%
Neuroscience 11 3%
Other 33 10%
Unknown 72 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,759,152
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Skeletal Muscle
#101
of 360 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,959
of 141,765 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Skeletal Muscle
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 360 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 141,765 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.