You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing data availability for the development of REDD-plus national reference levels
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carbon Balance and Management, September 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-0680-5-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Chisa Umemiya, Masahiro Amano, Suphawadee Wilamart |
| Abstract |
Data availability in developing countries is known to be extremely varied and is one of the constraints for setting the national reference levels (RLs) for the REDD-plus (i.e. 'Policy approaches and positive incentives on issues relating to reducing emissions from deforestation and forest degradation in developing countries; and the role of conservation, sustainable management of forests and enhancement of forest carbon stocks in developing countries') under the UNFCCC. Taking Thailand as a case study country, this paper compares three types of RLs, which require different levels of datasets, including a simple historic RL, a projected forest-trend RL, and a business-as-usual (BAU) RL. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Philippines | 1 | 3% |
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 35 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 46% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 21% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 2 | 5% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 17 | 44% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 18% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 6 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 3 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2010.
All research outputs
#5,852,724
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#94
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,081
of 98,516 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,516 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them