You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reduced emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD): a climate change mitigation strategy on a critical track
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Carbon Balance and Management, November 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1750-0680-4-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Michael Köhl, Thomas Baldauf, Daniel Plugge, Joachim Krug |
| Abstract |
Following recent discussions, there is hope that a mechanism for reduction of emissions from deforestation and forest degradation (REDD) will be agreed by the Parties of the UNFCCC at their 15th meeting in Copenhagen in 2009 as an eligible action to prevent climate changes and global warming in post-2012 commitment periods. Countries introducing a REDD-regime in order to generate benefits need to implement sound monitoring and reporting systems and specify the associated uncertainties. The principle of conservativeness addresses the problem of estimation errors and requests the reporting of reliable minimum estimates (RME). Here the potential to generate benefits from applying a REDD-regime is proposed with reference to sampling and non-sampling errors that influence the reliability of estimated activity data and emission factors. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 192 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Bolivia, Plurinational State of | 2 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Ireland | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 174 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 44 | 23% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 25 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 33 | 17% |
| Unknown | 25 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 78 | 41% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 14% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 21 | 11% |
| Social Sciences | 16 | 8% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 15 | 8% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2010.
All research outputs
#5,852,724
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#94
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#27,402
of 92,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 92,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them