↓ Skip to main content

Targeting deforestation rates in climate change policy: a "Preservation Pathway" approach

Overview of attention for article published in Carbon Balance and Management, March 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Targeting deforestation rates in climate change policy: a "Preservation Pathway" approach
Published in
Carbon Balance and Management, March 2008
DOI 10.1186/1750-0680-3-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin R Gurney, Leigh Raymond

Abstract

We present a new methodological approach to incorporating deforestation within the international climate change negotiating regime. The approach, called "Preservation Pathway" combines the desire for forest preservation with the need to reduce emissions associated with forest loss by focusing on the relative rate of change of forest cover as the criteria by which countries gain access to trading preserved forest carbon stocks. This approach avoids the technically challenging task of quantifying historical or future deforestation emission baselines. Rather, it places emphasis on improving quantification of contemporary stocks and the relative decline in deforestation rates necessary to preserve those stocks. This approach places emphasis on the complete emissions trajectory necessary to attain an agreed-upon preserved forest and as such, meets both forest conservation and climate goals simultaneously.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Madagascar 1 2%
Germany 1 2%
Unknown 48 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 29%
Student > Master 7 14%
Professor 6 12%
Other 5 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 10%
Other 8 16%
Unknown 5 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 23 45%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 8 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Psychology 2 4%
Social Sciences 2 4%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2010.
All research outputs
#5,852,724
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Carbon Balance and Management
#94
of 236 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,074
of 79,654 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Carbon Balance and Management
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 236 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 79,654 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them