You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
A comparative physical map reveals the pattern of chromosomal evolution between the turkey (Meleagris gallopavo) and chicken (Gallus gallus) genomes
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Genomics, September 2011
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2164-12-447 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yang Zhang, Xiaojun Zhang, Thomas H O'Hare, William S Payne, Jennifer J Dong, Chantel F Scheuring, Meiping Zhang, James J Huang, Mi-Kyung Lee, Mary E Delany, Hong-Bin Zhang, Jerry B Dodgson |
Abstract |
A robust bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC)-based physical map is essential for many aspects of genomics research, including an understanding of chromosome evolution, high-resolution genome mapping, marker-assisted breeding, positional cloning of genes, and quantitative trait analysis. To facilitate turkey genetics research and better understand avian genome evolution, a BAC-based integrated physical, genetic, and comparative map was developed for this important agricultural species. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 50% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 3% |
United States | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 39% |
Researcher | 4 | 13% |
Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 3% |
Librarian | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 39% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 19% |
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
Arts and Humanities | 1 | 3% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
Other | 1 | 3% |
Unknown | 9 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2014.
All research outputs
#4,184,584
of 23,881,329 outputs
Outputs from BMC Genomics
#1,628
of 10,793 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,369
of 128,105 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Genomics
#13
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,881,329 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 10,793 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 128,105 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.