You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of supplementation with n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids on cognitive performance and cardiometabolic risk markers in healthy 51 to 72 years old subjects: a randomized controlled cross-over study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-11-99 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anne Nilsson, Karl Radeborg, Ilkka Salo, Inger Björck |
| Abstract |
Higher plasma n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) have been associated with a lower risk of age related cognitive decline, and to beneficially affect cardiometabolic risk factors. A relation exists between metabolic disorders such as diabetes type 2 and cognitive decline. Results regarding the potential effects of n-3 PUFA on risk factors in healthy subjects are divergent, and studies regarding the possible relation between cardiometabolic parameters and cognitive performance are scarce. The objective was to evaluate the effects of five weeks intake of long chain n-3 PUFA on cognitive performance in healthy individuals, and to exploit the possible relation between outcomes in cognitive tests to cardiometabolic risk parameters. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 34 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Portugal | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 15 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 68% |
| Scientists | 5 | 15% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 15% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 198 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 195 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 40 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 40 | 20% |
| Researcher | 18 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 6% |
| Other | 30 | 15% |
| Unknown | 43 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 30% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 28 | 14% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 9% |
| Psychology | 16 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 11% |
| Unknown | 47 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 82. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 February 2023.
All research outputs
#525,029
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#171
of 1,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,442
of 286,334 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#9
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,530 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,334 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.