You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Decision aids linked to evidence summaries and clinical practice guidelines: results from user-testing in clinical encounters
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, June 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12911-021-01541-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anja Fog Heen, Per Olav Vandvik, Linn Brandt, Frankie Achille, Gordon Henry Guyatt, Elie A. Akl, Shaun Treewek, Thomas Agoritsas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 6 | 15% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 10% |
| Mexico | 2 | 5% |
| Argentina | 2 | 5% |
| Finland | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Colombia | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| El Salvador | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 14 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 59% |
| Scientists | 10 | 26% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 5% |
| Unknown | 1 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 37 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 37 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 11% |
| Researcher | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 43% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 5% |
| Psychology | 2 | 5% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 18 | 49% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 December 2023.
All research outputs
#1,755,220
of 25,758,211 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#84
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,027
of 456,139 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#3
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,758,211 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 456,139 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.