You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Consensus recommendations on dosing and administration of medical cannabis to treat chronic pain: results of a modified Delphi process
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cannabis Research, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s42238-021-00073-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Arun Bhaskar, Alan Bell, Michael Boivin, Wellington Briques, Matthew Brown, Hance Clarke, Claude Cyr, Elon Eisenberg, Ricardo Ferreira de Oliveira Silva, Eva Frohlich, Peter Georgius, Malcolm Hogg, Tina Ingrid Horsted, Caroline A. MacCallum, Kirsten R. Müller-Vahl, Colleen O’Connell, Robert Sealey, Marc Seibolt, Aaron Sihota, Brennan K. Smith, Dustin Sulak, Antonio Vigano, Dwight E. Moulin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 45 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 9 | 20% |
| Canada | 8 | 18% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | 11% |
| Australia | 4 | 9% |
| France | 2 | 4% |
| Djibouti | 1 | 2% |
| Ireland | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 15 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 39 | 87% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 9% |
| Scientists | 2 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 190 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 190 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 23 | 12% |
| Researcher | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 13 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 6% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 73 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 40 | 21% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 7% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 79 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 192. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 December 2023.
All research outputs
#205,841
of 25,323,244 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cannabis Research
#11
of 199 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,604
of 435,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cannabis Research
#2
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,323,244 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 199 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 435,160 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.