↓ Skip to main content

Efficacy and safety of clinically managed weight loss programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Efficacy and safety of clinically managed weight loss programs: a systematic review and meta-analysis protocol
Published in
Systematic Reviews, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13643-021-01750-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Katrina Cachero, Matthew Granger, Rebecca C. Mollard, Nicole Askin, George N. Okoli, Ahmed M. Abou-Setta, Dylan MacKay

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 3 7%
Librarian 2 5%
Other 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Student > Postgraduate 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 27 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 6 14%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 7%
Psychology 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 27 63%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,186,574
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#858
of 2,020 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,238
of 441,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#38
of 73 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,020 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,443 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 73 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.