↓ Skip to main content

A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cannabis Research, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A cannabis oracle? Delphi method not a substitute for randomized controlled trials of cannabinoids as therapeutics
Published in
Journal of Cannabis Research, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s42238-021-00074-0
Authors

Kevin P. Hill, Donald I. Abrams

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 25%
Other 1 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 13%
Student > Postgraduate 1 13%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 50%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Chemical Engineering 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 October 2021.
All research outputs
#11,281,556
of 19,529,814 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cannabis Research
#72
of 96 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,420
of 337,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cannabis Research
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,529,814 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 96 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.2. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them