↓ Skip to main content

Patients’ perceptions of the meaning of good care in surgical care: a grounded theory study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Nursing, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
123 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patients’ perceptions of the meaning of good care in surgical care: a grounded theory study
Published in
BMC Nursing, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s12912-016-0168-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tünde Mako, Pernilla Svanäng, Kristofer Bjerså

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 123 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 122 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 16 13%
Researcher 11 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Lecturer 7 6%
Other 27 22%
Unknown 37 30%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 46 37%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 4 3%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Psychology 2 2%
Other 8 7%
Unknown 42 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 August 2016.
All research outputs
#23,391,126
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Nursing
#870
of 990 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#347,605
of 388,687 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Nursing
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 990 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 388,687 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.