You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Nonadditivity in public and inhouse data: implications for drug design
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cheminformatics, July 2021
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13321-021-00525-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D. Gogishvili, E. Nittinger, C. Margreitter, C. Tyrchan |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
| Japan | 2 | 14% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 9 | 64% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 64% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 42 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Professor | 2 | 5% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 7% |
| Unknown | 15 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 7 | 17% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 10% |
| Engineering | 3 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 6 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 July 2021.
All research outputs
#4,507,909
of 25,079,131 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cheminformatics
#407
of 942 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,502
of 434,138 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cheminformatics
#13
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,079,131 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 942 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,138 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.