↓ Skip to main content

The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health…

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, October 2004
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (89th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
168 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities
Published in
BMC Public Health, October 2004
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-4-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Butterworth, Timothy Crosier

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Finland 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 12 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 16%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 9 12%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 10%
Social Sciences 8 10%
Psychology 7 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 4 5%
Other 10 13%
Unknown 14 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#1,555,231
of 21,360,407 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,705
of 13,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,556
of 286,490 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#2
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,360,407 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,864 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 286,490 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.