↓ Skip to main content

Engaging people who use drugs in policy and program development: A review of the literature

Overview of attention for article published in Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
20 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
76 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Engaging people who use drugs in policy and program development: A review of the literature
Published in
Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1747-597x-7-47
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lianping Ti, Despina Tzemis, Jane A Buxton

Abstract

Health policies and programs are increasingly being driven by people from the community to more effectively address their needs. While a large body of evidence supports peer engagement in the context of policy and program development for various populations, little is known about this form of engagement among people who use drugs (PWUD). Therefore, a narrative literature review was undertaken to provide an overview of this topic. Searches of PubMed and Academic Search Premier databases covering 1995-2010 were conducted to identify articles assessing peer engagement in policy and program development. In total, 19 articles were included for review. Our findings indicate that PWUD face many challenges that restrict their ability to engage with public health professionals and policy makers, including the high levels of stigma and discrimination that persist among this population. Although the literature shows that many international organizations are recommending the involvement of PWUD in policy and program development, our findings revealed a lack of published data on the implementation of these efforts. Gaps in the current evidence highlight the need for additional research to explore and document the engagement of PWUD in the areas of policy and program development. Further, efforts to minimize stigmatizing barriers associated with illicit drug use are urgently needed to improve the engagement of PWUD in decision making processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 20 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 3 2%
Portugal 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
Unknown 116 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 36 30%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 27 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 29 24%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 14%
Psychology 13 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 32 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 October 2021.
All research outputs
#1,696,322
of 25,728,350 outputs
Outputs from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#73
of 751 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,153
of 287,192 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Substance Abuse Treatment, Prevention, and Policy
#1
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,350 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 751 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 287,192 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them