You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Strengthening and stretching for rheumatoid arthritis of the hand (SARAH): design of a randomised controlled trial of a hand and upper limb exercise intervention - ISRCTN89936343
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2474-13-230 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sarah Trial Team, Jo Adams, Chris Bridle, Sukhdeep Dosanjh, Peter Heine, Sarah E Lamb, Joanne Lord, Christopher McConkey, Vivien Nichols, Francine Toye, Martin R Underwood, Mark A Williams, Esther M Williamson |
| Abstract |
Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) commonly affects the hands and wrists with inflammation, deformity, pain, weakness and restricted mobility leading to reduced function. The effectiveness of exercise for RA hands is uncertain, although evidence from small scale studies is promising. The Strengthening And Stretching for Rheumatoid Arthritis of the Hand (SARAH) trial is a pragmatic, multi-centre randomised controlled trial evaluating the clinical and cost effectiveness of adding an optimised exercise programme for hands and upper limbs to best practice usual care for patients with RA. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 44% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Canada | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 3 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 89% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 227 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 222 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 46 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 15% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 21 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 6% |
| Researcher | 13 | 6% |
| Other | 39 | 17% |
| Unknown | 59 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 29% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 21% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 5% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Other | 21 | 9% |
| Unknown | 69 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2012.
All research outputs
#3,594,032
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#705
of 4,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,619
of 276,400 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders
#7
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,028 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,400 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.