↓ Skip to main content

Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis

Overview of attention for article published in Implementation Science, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
49 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
65 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based guidelines in long-term care: a qualitative evidence synthesis
Published in
Implementation Science, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13012-021-01140-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Caitlin McArthur, Yuxin Bai, Patricia Hewston, Lora Giangregorio, Sharon Straus, Alexandra Papaioannou

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 49 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 185 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 22 12%
Student > Master 19 10%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 4%
Other 26 14%
Unknown 84 45%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 37 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 5%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Psychology 5 3%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 88 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 36. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 June 2023.
All research outputs
#1,106,496
of 25,123,315 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#177
of 1,790 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,993
of 432,069 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#3
of 27 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,123,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,790 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 432,069 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 27 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.