↓ Skip to main content

Survey design and analysis considerations when utilizing misclassified sampling strata

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Survey design and analysis considerations when utilizing misclassified sampling strata
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s12874-021-01332-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Aya A. Mitani, Nathaniel D. Mercaldo, Sebastien Haneuse, Jonathan S. Schildcrout

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Unspecified 3 19%
Researcher 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 6%
Student > Master 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 7 44%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unspecified 3 19%
Psychology 2 13%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 6%
Other 3 19%
Unknown 5 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#837
of 2,056 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,779
of 437,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,056 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,622 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.