↓ Skip to main content

Quantitative fluorescence loss in photobleaching for analysis of protein transport and aggregation

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (63rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
4 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
43 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
120 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Quantitative fluorescence loss in photobleaching for analysis of protein transport and aggregation
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-13-296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel Wüstner, Lukasz M Solanko, Frederik W Lund, Daniel Sage, Hans J Schroll, Michael A Lomholt

Abstract

Fluorescence loss in photobleaching (FLIP) is a widely used imaging technique, which provides information about protein dynamics in various cellular regions. In FLIP, a small cellular region is repeatedly illuminated by an intense laser pulse, while images are taken with reduced laser power with a time lag between the bleaches. Despite its popularity, tools are lacking for quantitative analysis of FLIP experiments. Typically, the user defines regions of interest (ROIs) for further analysis which is subjective and does not allow for comparing different cells and experimental settings.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 2%
Switzerland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 113 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 31%
Researcher 20 17%
Student > Master 17 14%
Student > Bachelor 10 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 7%
Other 7 6%
Unknown 21 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 26 22%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 22 18%
Physics and Astronomy 14 12%
Engineering 7 6%
Chemistry 7 6%
Other 19 16%
Unknown 25 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 October 2019.
All research outputs
#6,384,139
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,468
of 7,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#47,305
of 179,089 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#35
of 104 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,252 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 179,089 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 104 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its contemporaries.