↓ Skip to main content

A rare case of chest wall lipoma growing into the pleural cavity: a case report

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
3 tweeters

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A rare case of chest wall lipoma growing into the pleural cavity: a case report
Published in
Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13019-021-01576-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hyo Joon Jang, Bu Hyeon Choi, Seong Oh. Park

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2021.
All research outputs
#12,778,175
of 19,934,082 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#260
of 1,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#181,970
of 334,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiothoracic Surgery
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 19,934,082 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,036 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 334,665 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them