You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mindfulness-and body-psychotherapy-based group treatment of chronic tinnitus: a randomized controlled pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies, November 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6882-12-235 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Peter M Kreuzer, Monika Goetz, Maria Holl, Martin Schecklmann, Michael Landgrebe, Susanne Staudinger, Berthold Langguth |
| Abstract |
Tinnitus, the perception of sound in absence of an external acoustic source, impairs the quality of life in 2% of the population. Since in most cases causal treatment is not possible, the majority of therapeutic attempts aim at developing and strengthening individual coping and habituation strategies. Therapeutic interventions that incorporate training in mindfulness meditation have become increasingly popular in the treatment of stress-related disorders. Here we conducted a randomized, controlled clinical study to investigate the efficacy of a specific mindfulness- and body-psychotherapy based program in patients suffering from chronic tinnitus. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 33% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 187 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | 2% |
| Malaysia | 2 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Sweden | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 178 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 33 | 18% |
| Researcher | 27 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 23 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 17 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 15 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 20% |
| Unknown | 34 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 55 | 29% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 39 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 9 | 5% |
| Other | 16 | 9% |
| Unknown | 41 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2023.
All research outputs
#5,059,665
of 24,753,534 outputs
Outputs from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#920
of 3,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,516
of 288,215 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Complementary Medicine and Therapies
#17
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,753,534 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,878 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 288,215 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.