↓ Skip to main content

Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Care, July 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Individualized resuscitation strategy for septic shock formalized by finite mixture modeling and dynamic treatment regimen
Published in
Critical Care, July 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13054-021-03682-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Penglin Ma, Jingtao Liu, Feng Shen, Xuelian Liao, Ming Xiu, Heling Zhao, Mingyan Zhao, Jing Xie, Peng Wang, Man Huang, Tong Li, Meili Duan, Kejian Qian, Yue Peng, Feihu Zhou, Xin Xin, Xianyao Wan, ZongYu Wang, Shusheng Li, Jianwei Han, Zhenliang Li, Guolei Ding, Qun Deng, Jicheng Zhang, Yue Zhu, Wenjing Ma, Jingwen Wang, Yan Kang, Zhongheng Zhang

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 38 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Student > Bachelor 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Lecturer 1 3%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 24 63%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 9 24%
Computer Science 3 8%
Unspecified 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 23 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2021.
All research outputs
#8,541,797
of 25,392,582 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#4,398
of 6,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#171,298
of 447,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#88
of 109 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,392,582 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,555 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 109 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.