↓ Skip to main content

Local social environmental factors are associated with household food insecurity in a longitudinal study of children

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
64 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Local social environmental factors are associated with household food insecurity in a longitudinal study of children
Published in
BMC Public Health, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-12-1038
Pubmed ID
Authors

Megan Ann Carter, Lise Dubois, Mark S Tremblay, Monica Taljaard

Abstract

Food insecurity is a significant public health problem in North America and elsewhere. The prevalence of food insecurity varies by country of residence; within countries, it is strongly associated with household socioeconomic status, but the local environment may also play an important role. In this study, we analyzed secondary data from a population-based survey conducted in Québec, Canada, to determine if five local environmental factors: material and social deprivation, social cohesion, disorder, and living location were associated with changes in household food insecurity over a period of 6 years, while adjusting for household socioeconomic status (SES) and other factors.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 169 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 45 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 17%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Bachelor 15 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 32 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 37 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 13%
Psychology 12 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Other 22 13%
Unknown 45 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 December 2012.
All research outputs
#6,010,002
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,166
of 14,763 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#62,468
of 277,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#95
of 287 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 14,763 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 287 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.