You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The role of the carotenoids, lutein and zeaxanthin, in protecting against age-related macular degeneration: A review based on controversial evidence
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nutrition Journal, December 2003
|
DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-2-20 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Maneli Mozaffarieh, Stefan Sacu, Andreas Wedrich |
Abstract |
A review of the role of the carotenoids, lutein and zeaxanthin, and their function in altering the pathogenesis of age-related macular degeneration (AMD). |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 2 | 67% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 195 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Australia | 1 | <1% |
India | 1 | <1% |
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 189 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 32 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 12% |
Researcher | 22 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 22 | 11% |
Other | 14 | 7% |
Other | 35 | 18% |
Unknown | 46 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 26% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 16% |
Chemistry | 11 | 6% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 5% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 9 | 5% |
Other | 29 | 15% |
Unknown | 55 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 July 2021.
All research outputs
#1,381,671
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#378
of 1,423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,777
of 133,016 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#3
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,423 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 133,016 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.