↓ Skip to main content

Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa

Overview of attention for article published in Systematic Reviews, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
blogs
6 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
23 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
360 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
231 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Does use of the CONSORT Statement impact the completeness of reporting of randomised controlled trials published in medical journals? A Cochrane reviewa
Published in
Systematic Reviews, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/2046-4053-1-60
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lucy Turner, Larissa Shamseer, Douglas G Altman, Kenneth F Schulz, David Moher

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 231 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 5 2%
Australia 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Uruguay 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 1 <1%
Unknown 217 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 50 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 15%
Researcher 33 14%
Student > Bachelor 17 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 7%
Other 61 26%
Unknown 19 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 87 38%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 8%
Psychology 18 8%
Social Sciences 16 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 6%
Other 35 15%
Unknown 42 18%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 February 2021.
All research outputs
#393,904
of 16,975,484 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#51
of 1,524 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,169
of 261,244 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#2
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 16,975,484 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,524 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,244 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.