You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Careers of an elite cohort of U.S. basic life science postdoctoral fellows and the influence of their mentor's citation record
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, November 2010
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-10-80 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
David G Levitt |
Abstract |
There is general agreement that the number of U.S. science PhDs being trained far exceeds the number of future academic positions. One suggested approach to this problem is to significantly reduce the number of PhD positions. A counter argument is that students are aware of the limited academic positions but have chosen a PhD track because it opens other, non-academic, opportunities. The latter view requires that students have objective information about what careers options will be available for them. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 43% |
Canada | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Colombia | 2 | 4% |
Mexico | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Singapore | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 51 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 14 | 25% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 13% |
Student > Master | 7 | 13% |
Other | 6 | 11% |
Professor | 4 | 7% |
Other | 10 | 18% |
Unknown | 8 | 14% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Social Sciences | 12 | 21% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 9% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 5 | 9% |
Psychology | 4 | 7% |
Other | 7 | 13% |
Unknown | 13 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 April 2018.
All research outputs
#1,658,971
of 23,340,595 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#204
of 3,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,072
of 100,783 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#2
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,340,595 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,442 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 100,783 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.