↓ Skip to main content

Prevalence of malaria and associated factors in Benna Tsemay district of pastoralist community, Southern Ethiopia

Overview of attention for article published in Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines, August 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
117 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prevalence of malaria and associated factors in Benna Tsemay district of pastoralist community, Southern Ethiopia
Published in
Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines, August 2016
DOI 10.1186/s40794-016-0033-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Gidie Woju Debo, Dejene Hailu Kassa

Abstract

Though the burden of malaria is declining, challenges in control continue globally, regionally and nationally as the transmission of malaria is dynamic and determinants differ by place and time, and across populations. The current level of knowledge on malaria prevalence and associated factors in specific communities, such as pastoralist communities of Ethiopia, is lacking. A community based cross-sectional survey was conducted among pastoralist communities from December 2011 to January 2012. Background information and peripheral blood samples were collected from 461 randomly selected study participants. Multivariate regression analysis was done to explore the risk factors associated to malaria. The prevalence of malaria among 461 examined study participants was 6.1 % (95 % CI = 4.2, 8.5). The infection rate with Plasmodium falciparum and Plasmodium vivax was 64.3 % (95 % CI = 45.5, 80.2) and 21.4 % (95 % CI = 19.8, 54.5), respectively, while mixed infection was 14.3 % (95 % CI = 4.7, 30.9). The infection rate was higher among lactating (22.2 %, 95 % CI =7.5, 45.3) and pregnant (17.6 %, 95 % CI = 4.7, 40.9) women compared with other community groups like infants (12 %). Mosquito net coverage of the study population was 90.1 % with an average of 1.8 per household. Traditional practices related to malaria prevention and treatment were not significantly associated with malaria infection (p > 0.05). Pregnancy (adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR]: 12.6, 95 % CI = 1.7, 94.7) and saving mosquito net for later use (AOR 9.6: 95 % CI = 2.2, 42.8) were independently associated with prevalent malaria infection. In spite of high coverage of mosquito nets, prevalence of malaria in this pastoralist community was high, affecting pregnant and lactating women at a higher rate. Pregnancy and saving mosquito nets for later use were identified as the associated risk factors. Health education on prevalence of malaria and knowledge on risk factors might be able to change the health behavior in this pastoralist community which consequently can decrease the malaria morbidity and mortality. ISRCTN ISRCTN73824458, Registered 28 September 2014.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 117 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 117 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 23 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 7%
Student > Bachelor 8 7%
Researcher 7 6%
Student > Postgraduate 7 6%
Other 15 13%
Unknown 49 42%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 18 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 6%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 5%
Social Sciences 4 3%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 52 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2017.
All research outputs
#15,381,871
of 22,884,315 outputs
Outputs from Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
#92
of 135 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#215,000
of 336,882 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tropical Diseases, Travel Medicine and Vaccines
#9
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,884,315 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 135 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,882 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.