↓ Skip to main content

Apigenin and luteolin modulate microglial activation via inhibition of STAT1-induced CD40 expression

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (64th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
180 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
119 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Apigenin and luteolin modulate microglial activation via inhibition of STAT1-induced CD40 expression
Published in
Journal of Neuroinflammation, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1742-2094-5-41
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kavon Rezai-Zadeh, Jared Ehrhart, Yun Bai, Paul R Sanberg, Paula Bickford, Jun Tan, R Douglas Shytle

Abstract

It is well known that most neurodegenerative diseases are associated with microglia-mediated inflammation. Our previous research demonstrates that the CD40 signaling is critically involved in microglia-related immune responses in the brain. For example, it is well known that the activation of the signal transducer and activator of transcription (STAT) signaling pathway plays a central role in interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma)-induced microglial CD40 expression. We and others have previously reported that microglial CD40 expression is significantly induced by IFN-gamma and amyloid-beta (A beta) peptide. Recent studies have shown that certain flavonoids possess anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective properties distinct from their well-known anti-oxidant effects. In particular, flavonoids, apigenin and luteolin have been found to be effective CD40 immunomodulators.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 119 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 116 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 19%
Researcher 14 12%
Student > Master 11 9%
Student > Bachelor 11 9%
Student > Postgraduate 9 8%
Other 18 15%
Unknown 33 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 27 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Chemistry 7 6%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 44 37%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2015.
All research outputs
#7,825,522
of 25,067,172 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#1,312
of 2,899 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,291
of 96,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroinflammation
#4
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,067,172 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,899 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,012 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.