↓ Skip to main content

Presepsin values and prognostic nutritional index predict mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a pilot study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Research Notes, June 2021
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Presepsin values and prognostic nutritional index predict mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a pilot study
Published in
BMC Research Notes, June 2021
DOI 10.1186/s13104-021-05659-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yuichiro Shimoyama, Osamu Umegaki, Noriko Kadono, Toshiaki Minami

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 3 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 2 67%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 67%
Unknown 1 33%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,002,066
of 20,034,281 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#749
of 3,966 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,729
of 340,480 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 20,034,281 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,966 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 340,480 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them