You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Presepsin values and prognostic nutritional index predict mortality in intensive care unit patients with sepsis: a pilot study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Research Notes, June 2021
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13104-021-05659-9 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Yuichiro Shimoyama, Osamu Umegaki, Noriko Kadono, Toshiaki Minami |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 4 | 25% |
Researcher | 2 | 13% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Student > Bachelor | 1 | 6% |
Student > Master | 1 | 6% |
Other | 3 | 19% |
Unknown | 4 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 38% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 19% |
Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 5 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 July 2021.
All research outputs
#5,895,945
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from BMC Research Notes
#859
of 4,306 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#122,610
of 442,459 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Research Notes
#19
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,306 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 442,459 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.