↓ Skip to main content

Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
39 tweeters
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1442 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1578 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Enhancing transparency in reporting the synthesis of qualitative research: ENTREQ
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, November 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-2288-12-181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Allison Tong, Kate Flemming, Elizabeth McInnes, Sandy Oliver, Jonathan Craig

Abstract

The syntheses of multiple qualitative studies can pull together data across different contexts, generate new theoretical or conceptual models, identify research gaps, and provide evidence for the development, implementation and evaluation of health interventions. This study aims to develop a framework for reporting the synthesis of qualitative health research.

Twitter Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 39 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1,578 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 <1%
Canada 5 <1%
South Africa 3 <1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Indonesia 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Virgin Islands, U.S. 1 <1%
Other 9 <1%
Unknown 1539 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 304 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 275 17%
Researcher 195 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 111 7%
Student > Postgraduate 100 6%
Other 347 22%
Unknown 246 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 365 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 276 17%
Social Sciences 198 13%
Psychology 147 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 49 3%
Other 233 15%
Unknown 310 20%

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,056,240
of 21,446,675 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#132
of 1,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,892
of 291,270 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#3
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 21,446,675 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,905 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 291,270 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.