↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Effects of 7 days on an ad libitum low-fat vegan diet: the McDougall Program cohort

Overview of attention for article published in Nutrition Journal, February 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
45 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Effects of 7 days on an ad libitum low-fat vegan diet: the McDougall Program cohort
Published in
Nutrition Journal, February 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12937-017-0234-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

John McDougall, Laurie E. Thomas, Craig McDougall, Gavin Moloney, Bradley Saul, John S. Finnell, Kelly Richardson, Katelin Mae Petersen

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 45 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 45 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 13 29%
Student > Master 9 20%
Researcher 4 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 4%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 9 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 9%
Social Sciences 3 7%
Other 8 18%
Unknown 9 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2020.
All research outputs
#7,656,930
of 23,310,485 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#940
of 1,443 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,318
of 424,375 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#12
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,310,485 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,443 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 36.7. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 424,375 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.